Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 is Here: A Look at the New Release and Its Impact on Clones

Good morning everyone, I'm Dimitri Bellini, and welcome back to Quadrata, my channel dedicated to the world of open source and IT. This week, we're shifting focus from our usual Zabbix discussions to something that's recently made waves in the Linux world: the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 (RHEL 10)!

The arrival of a new RHEL version is always significant, especially for the enterprise sector. So, let's dive into what RHEL 10 brings to the table and, crucially, how its popular clones – AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, and Oracle Linux – are adapting to this new landscape. If you find this content useful, don't forget to put a like and subscribe to the channel if you haven't already!

What's New in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is renowned as the most important distribution in the enterprise world, where companies pay for official support and long-term stability. RHEL versions are designed to be stable over time, offer excellent hardware and software support, and typically come with at least 10 years of support. This makes it ideal for server and enterprise environments, rather than your everyday desktop.

With RHEL 10, Red Hat continues to build on this foundation while embracing new IT trends. Here are some of the key highlights:

Key Highlights of RHEL 10:

The RHEL Clones: Navigating the Landscape After CentOS

As many of you know, Red Hat's decision to shift CentOS from a direct RHEL rebuild to CentOS Stream (a rolling-release version that's upstream of RHEL) led to the rise of several community-driven distributions aiming to fill the gap. The most prominent among these are AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, and Oracle Linux, each striving to provide an enterprise-grade, RHEL-compatible experience.

With RHEL 10 out, these clones are now releasing their own version 10s. Let's see how they're approaching it.

AlmaLinux 10 "PurpleLion" – The Swift Innovator

AlmaLinux was quick to respond, releasing its version 10 (codename PurpleLion) just about a week after RHEL 10's announcement. AlmaLinux is community-driven and has made some distinct choices:


Rocky Linux 10 – The Staunch Loyalist

Rocky Linux is known for its purist approach, aiming for 100% bug-for-bug compatibility with RHEL.


Oracle Linux 10 – The Enterprise Powerhouse

Oracle Linux also maintains bug-for-bug compatibility with RHEL and is a strong contender, especially in enterprise environments.


OpenELA: A Collaborative Effort for Enterprise Linux

After Red Hat changed how it provided sources, a new initiative called OpenELA (Open Enterprise Linux Association) was formed. This non-profit collaboration involves CIQ (the company behind Rocky Linux), Oracle, and SUSE. Their primary goal is to work together to obtain RHEL sources and continue to provide free and open enterprise Linux versions based on RHEL. Notably, AlmaLinux has chosen its own path and is not part of OpenELA.

Choosing Your Champion: AlmaLinux vs. Rocky Linux vs. Oracle Linux

So, with these options, which one should you choose?


The speed of release is also a factor for some. AlmaLinux tends to be the fastest, while Rocky Linux and Oracle Linux are a bit more measured. However, whether a release comes out a few weeks sooner or later might not be critical for many, as long as it's timely.

My Perspective: Why Standardization Matters in the Enterprise

Personally, I've decided to stabilize on Red Hat and its derivatives for enterprise environments because standardization is fundamental. When you're working in complex systems, introducing too many variables can lead to unpredictable problems.

I encountered a situation a while ago that illustrates this. We were setting up synthetic monitoring using a Selenium Docker container. It worked perfectly in our environment. However, for our client, who was using Podman (common in RHEL environments) instead of Docker as the container engine, the same setup was incredibly slow after just a few concurrent connections – the CPU would max out, and it was a complete mess. Understanding that subtle difference was key to resolving the issue.

This is why, for certain enterprise scenarios, I lean towards RHEL-based systems. They are often more rigorously tested and standardized for such environments, which can save a lot of headaches down the line.

Conclusion

The Linux distribution landscape is ever-evolving, and the release of RHEL 10 alongside new versions from its clones is a testament to this dynamism. Each distribution we've discussed offers a solid RHEL-compatible experience but caters to slightly different needs and philosophies.

I hope this overview has been interesting and helps you understand the current state of play. The choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements, whether it's cutting-edge innovation, purist compatibility, or enterprise-grade support.

What are your thoughts on RHEL 10 and its clones? Which distribution are you leaning towards, or currently using, and why? Let me know in the comments below! The battle of distributions is always a hot topic!

Thanks for reading, and if you enjoyed this, please share it and make sure you're subscribed to Quadrata on YouTube for more content like this. You can also join the conversation on our ZabbixItalia Telegram Channel.

A big greeting from me, Dimitri Bellini. Bye everyone, and I'll see you next week!




Follow Quadrata: